All Eyes On Me
By Brock Yates March, 29, 2002
paranoids have enemies," pronounced
a bumper sticker on the back of a ratty old Ford I spotted several years ago.
I suppose my reaction was vaguely sympathetic, considering a mild disposition
in that direction, especially when it comes to the meddling of the nanny state
in my personal affairs. I was reminded of the nanny's omnipresence when the
subject of automotive black boxes was raised in a recent issue of the Wall
Street Journal. The piece concentrated
on the question of how the data from air-bag "Event
Data Recorders" or EDR's, can be stored
and employed. Who owns the data? The owner of the vehicle? The government? Trial
lawyers? The police?
If you want to contribute with our work, sending no money,
All current GM and Ford automobiles and trucks contain EDR's that capture a
mass of vehicle data five seconds prior to a crash; speed, throttle settings,
braking activity, cornering forces, etc. Other manufacturers are sure to follow,
especially if government regulations mandate such devices in the name of safety.
(And aren't all such regulations promulgated in the broad-brush panacea of "public
Not only will your future automobile probably contain an EDR, but under the
hood will be a neat little computer called the OBD, or On-Board
Diagnostic system. It records engine data,
presumably to help technicians perform proper maintenance and make the repairs.
But critics claim that OBD's have the potential of poking into the driving habits
of the owner to a point of invading privacy, much like their sister EDR's.
"Sir, your OBD and your EDR indicate
that you drive at a steady 75 mph, which is illegal, that you fail to change
your oil at the correct intervals, that you drive one-handed while using your
cell phone and pick your nose at red lights. This voids your warranty."
Two computer brains -- one under the hood and the other packed in your air bag
system -- record your every move behind the wheel; seemingly harmless enough
unless you're involved in a crash or a breakdown, when all that data becomes
somebody else's -- probably to your detriment.
Moreover, most manufacturers are offering satellite uplink connections to your
vehicle. General Motors 'OnStar'
system is prototypical and probably the best known. This looks good at first
glance; a simple device for service information without penalty. So too for
computerized toll payments like New York State's "EZ
Pass" system that permits motorists
to ease past toll booths while paying later. A neat convenience that helps to
ease congestion. But the potential for mischief is great. ("Sir,
the computer says you ran between toll stations A and B at 86 mph, which is
21 miles an hour over the legal limit. You are therefore fined $600 and your
license is suspended.") New York authorities
deny that such expansion of "EZ Pass" is intended, but that capability
is within easy reach of the Big Mamma computer controlling the system.
Add photo radar and other highly sophisticated traffic monitoring devices already
in use in Canada and Europe and we face the possibility that all vehicular traffic
can be monitored at all times. It's a lay-up with modern computer technology
to keep track and record the movement of every motor vehicle in the nation.
It could be justified on the basis of safety (of course), speed monitoring,
emergency scene responses, gridlock avoidance, etc.
Want to know where every suspected drug dealer, Arab flight student, anti-government
dissident, child molester, rapist or Mafioso is driving at the moment? Just
hit the "enter" key.
We have opened Pandora's box with the computer. How we square it with privacy
issues is a dilemma. We are continually shocked to learn how much data is already
stored regarding our personal lives, particularly relating to health and financial
issues. But one refuge from the probing eye of Big Brother remains the personal
motor vehicle. We can still move about with relative freedom, presuming we obey
a few simple rules of the road.
But the potential for intrusion by all manner of snoops ranging from police
agencies, insurance providers, government safety types, employers, etc. is on
the horizon. Presumably legislators of all political persuasions will rally
to prevent any such insidious peeking, leaving only we closet paranoids to fret.
But make no mistake, the ability for computers to look over our shoulders ever
millisecond that we are behind the wheel is a clear and present danger. One
can only hope that concerns for "public safety" will not totally destroy
freedom in this rare and cherished sanctuary of personal privacy.
Back to TOP
Back to Politics
Go to FAEC's Spanish Version
You are visitor No.:
since July, 2001
FastCounter by bCentral
please click the icons below, Thanks you, very much!
The Terapin mine stores thousands of your digital photographs easily
without expensive memory cards nor laptop. See how it works here...