The stations on the map are uniformely distributed, and the temperature trend is a clear representation of the climate status of the region.
West Virgina, contrary to IPCC's claim of "warming everywhere", has cooled by +0.33º F in 100 years, at about +0.03º F per decade (+ 0,01º C).
Cities with warming trends are explained by the "urban heat island effect" but, is there a "urban cold island effect" for explaining the cooling cities? Surely greens and the IPCC would love to have such an "effect" for explaining these "unexplained" coolings.
In the same way as catastrophists attacked the satellite readings because they showed a cooling stratosphere and upper troposphere, they will surely devise and come up with an equally absurd theory for the cooling citites. Just wait and see. And remember you saw it predicted in this website!
Global warming means there is an overall warming everywhere in the world, but there must be a reason for the cooling in some regions - reason that has not been explained by any climate model. As CO2 is blamed for the temperature increase and, as CO2 has increased steadily, there shouldn't be any cooling anywhere. As we see cooling in many places around the world, the relation between CO2 and temperature increase has been grossly exagerated.
Furthermore, as the relation between CO2 and temperature is derived from computer models, these climatic models are not an accurate image of the climatic system, and they cannot give an accurate prediction of the future climate.